Have been reading firstpost’s account of the latest sting on
Arvind Kejriwal with some amusement and some frustration. Here are my thoughts
#JustThinkingAloud FP may soon realize that
it is not just the cricket fans but their aam aadmi reader who has also matured
and FP may soon need to be glued to their twitter stream as well
a)
I am amused because of the following:
FP thinks the colourful language used by
Arvind is okay for run of the mill politicians the kinds that he despises (or
in other FP would have you believe pretends that he despises) and by using this
language when he is angry shows his class and true colors. According to FP this
language is unbecoming of an intellectual like AK and IITian, IRS officer and
anti-corruption crusader and is almost Virat Kohliesque (FP should be more
careful here in what they are implying, as in another article which they get an
easy target in terms of Times Now and the #shameontimesnow episode…) .
a.
In my view AK never pretended to be an
intellectual
b.
He will tell you that he is only an aam aadmi
c.
He is an aam aadmi with a singular mission ( at
least above all, to wipe out corruption from Indian politics and will take no
prisoners in his fight against the same)
d.
In fact, the writer appears to be following some
Victorian way of life where he has never been in touch with the aam aadmi,
IITians much less IRS officers. I have seen a few from close quarters. As great
as there are their language when frustrated can be quite colourful that too in
East Man Color.
e.
He invokes Gandhi as an ideal for use of
language, Tough to argue with that. But I could have said 2+2 = 4 and it would
have been tough to argue with that too.
f.
If anything the language only shows his
frustrations with the two people in question and makes him sound like a common
man. Much like the rest of us not pretending to be any different
b)
I am also a little frustrated, which made me
write this ( and I don’t claim to be great at writing)
I am a regular reader of FP. But I am
frustrated that every now and then editorial slack allows them to put forward
arguments that will stretch any logic beyond logic. Remotest of links and (even
alliterations J)
are used to sensationalize matters. Any person can see through this creative
license that writers use to twist facts just to make a point. FP is guilt of
the same type of bad journalism that they have pointed out (opportunistically
at their rival channel Times Now) and saying that cricket fans have matured.
No comments:
Post a Comment